This report contains our assessment of the medical care provided to incarcerated people at Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison at Corcoran between February and July 2023. We rated the case review component of the overall health care quality adequate and the compliance component of the overall health care quality inadequate.
This report contains our assessment of the medical care provided to incarcerated people at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility between December 2022 and May 2023. We rated the case review component of the overall health care quality adequate and the compliance component of the overall health care quality inadequate.
This report contains our assessment of the medical care provided to incarcerated people at North Kern State Prison between November 2022 and April 2023. We rated the case review component of the overall health care quality adequate and the compliance component of the overall health care quality inadequate.
In this audit, we reviewed the department’s classification process to screen incarcerated people for escape risk and observed physical security layouts and protocols for incarcerated people counts. We reviewed documentation on select escapes that occurred between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023, from minimum-support facilities and conservation camps—the only locations with reported escapes during the audit period. We also assessed both the security recommendations made by managers at affected facilities and the corrective action taken to address the escapes.
See Fact Sheet
This report summarizes the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s performance in conducting internal investigations and handling employee discipline cases we monitored and closed from January 1, 2024, through June 30, 2024. Of the 197 cases we monitored and closed in this time period, we rated 31 cases sufficient, 101 sufficient with recommendations, and 65 cases insufficient.
This report examines the inquiries completed by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s Allegation Inquiry Management Section (AIMS) from January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021. According to the department’s data, during 2021, AIMS received 3,434 staff complaint inquiries referred by wardens and completed 1,445 inquiries. OIG inspectors monitored 28 inquiry cases. We assessed the overall inquiry processes performed by the department as poor in 17 cases, or 60 percent. For the remaining 11 cases, or 39 percent, we determined the department performed satisfactory work in completing the cases.
The Office of the Inspector General safeguards the integrity of the State’s correctional system by providing oversight and transparency regarding the policies and practices of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. We carry out this mission through diligent monitoring, honest assessment, and dedication to improving the correctional system of our State.
We promise to do our best to assist in safeguarding the integrity of the State’s correctional system. If you have witnessed or know of any misconduct within the operations of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, please report the information to us, below.
Beginning January 1, 2025, Penal Code section 6130 requires the Office of the Inspector General to publish the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (department) Centralized List of Disapproved Publications on the OIG’s website. The list, which is updated on a monthly basis, is also available on the department’s website. Existing law grants incarcerated people the right to purchase, receive, and read publications (newspapers, periodicals, and books), subject to restrictions reasonably related to legitimate penological interests. The department’s disapproved publications list includes the publications that the department has prohibited because they violate department regulations. Penal Code section 6130 permits the OIG to review publications on the list to determine if the office concurs with the department’s determination that the publication is in violation of department regulations.
The OIG evaluates the qualifications of every candidate whom the Governor nominates for appointment as a warden at an adult correctional institution or as a superintendent at a juvenile facility and the Inspector General reports the recommendation regarding each candidate’s qualifications in confidence to the Governor.
It is the policy of the California Office of the Inspector General (OIG) to provide service in the language of our customers.
If you feel that we have not provided you with adequate interpretation services or have denied you an available translated document, please complete and submit the OIG’s Language Access Complaint Process and Complaint Form, available in English and Spanish.
